Compare · Grata
Grata alternatives and competitors, with pricing and Grata vs PitchBook
Grata is a sourcing engine for private markets: find the companies that fit a thesis, build the list, work the outreach. Investables.ai is a public-market research layer: one structured card per public asset, both sides of the argument, risk flags surfaced, in seconds, on a monthly subscription. They do genuinely different jobs, and they share this page because a meaningful share of Grata pricing searches come from people whose real question turns out to be about public companies.
AI research card
Stocks · ETFs · Crypto · StartupsEnter any ticker to see a research card
Thesis, bull and bear case, key metrics, comparables and risk flags, synthesized into one structured tear-sheet.
Sample output is illustrative. Not financial advice.
Thesis
Bull case
Bear case
Key metrics
illustrative
Comparables
Risk flags
Informational only · sample output, not live market data · not financial advice.
Enter a ticker · read the research card · you decide
Grata is an AI-native private company search platform covering roughly 21 million private companies, built for deal sourcing rather than for reading a market. Founded in New York in 2016, it was acquired by Datasite on 3 June 2025 and now runs as a business unit inside it. Grata publishes tier names but no prices, and the single median figure circulating for it is weaker evidence than almost anyone quoting it realizes.
The short answer
What is the best Grata alternative?
It depends what you use Grata for. For private company financials, deal comps and fund data rather than sourcing, PitchBook at a median $31,875 a year. For technology market maps and startup health scoring, CB Insights at $46,984. For cheap broad sourcing, Tracxn at a reported $1,000 to $1,500 a month or Crunchbase at $99. For European coverage, Dealroom from about EUR 12,500. Sourcescrub was the closest direct competitor and is now owned by Datasite too, which narrows the field. For public company research, Investables.ai from $29 a month. Grata itself is quote-only and reported at roughly $10,000 to $100,000 a year.
Last updated August 2026
What each one costs
Grata pricing vs Investables.ai pricing
Grata publishes three tier names and no prices. Everything below is what buyers, comparison sources and procurement marketplaces reported publicly as of August 2026. Read the note on the median row before you budget against it.
| Plan or deployment | Price (USD) | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Commonly reported range | $10,000 to $100,000 / year | Varies by company size, use case and negotiation. The most honest figure available |
| Circulating "median" contract | $155,000 / year | Built on six buyer reports at 30% stated confidence, and above the top of the reported range. Weak evidence |
| Growth tier | Quote only | Named on the Grata pricing page with no figure attached. Entry search and list building |
| Scale tier | Quote only | Named with no figure. Larger teams, broader exports and workflow features |
| Alpha tier | Quote only | Named with no figure. The top configuration, where API and integrations sit |
| Add Ons | Quote only, priced separately | API access and extra modules are line items rather than tier features |
| Contract terms | One year minimum, auto-renewal | Cancellation administrative fees are documented. Read the renewal clause |
| Free tier or self-serve trial | None | Demo request only. No way to create an account from the website |
| Investables.ai Analyst | $29 / month | 50 research cards a month with thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics and risk flags |
| Investables.ai Pro | $79 / month | 300 cards a month plus earnings call and filing summaries, exports |
| Investables.ai Team | $249 / month | Shared workspace, higher limits and team seats |
Grata figures are publicly reported third-party ranges gathered August 2026, not official quotes. The $155,000 median is shown because it is widely cited, not because it is reliable: its source states a sample of six buyer reports and a 30% confidence rating, and it sits above the top of the range other sources report. Confirm current pricing with Grata or Datasite before budgeting.
The full landscape
Grata competitors compared
What each platform is actually for, what it reportedly costs, and who it fits. Enterprise figures are third-party reported ranges gathered August 2026, not quotes.
| Platform | Reported price | What it is for and who it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Grata | Quote only. Reported $10,000 to $100,000 / year | AI-native private company search across about 21 million companies, built for deal origination. PE, corporate development, M&A advisors and search funds. A Datasite business unit since June 2025. |
| Sourcescrub | Quote only | The closest like-for-like sourcing competitor, focused on bootstrapped and founder-owned companies. Acquired by Grata in August 2025, so now the same owner. |
| PitchBook | Quote only. Median reported $31,875 / year | Private company financials, deal comps, cap tables and fund performance. Deal teams that need diligence data rather than discovery. Much deeper verified pricing sample. |
| CB Insights | Quote only. Median $46,984 / year | Technology market maps, emerging startup discovery and Mosaic health scores. Corporate strategy and innovation teams rather than origination teams. |
| Tracxn | Reported $1,000 to $1,500 / month | Broad startup sourcing across hundreds of sectors with analyst review. The budget option for scouting. |
| Crunchbase | Pro $99 / month, Business $199 / month | Company and funding basics. Wide coverage, correspondingly shallow. Early sourcing and quick lookups. |
| Dealroom | Premium from about EUR 12,500 / year | European startup and investment intelligence with strong regional depth. Three-seat minimum. |
| Preqin | Quote only. Median reported near $50,000 / year | Alternative assets: fund performance, LP commitments and GP benchmarking. Owned by BlackRock since 2025. |
| Investables.ai | $29 to $249 / month | A structured AI research card per public asset: thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics, comparables and risk flags. No private company data. Individual investors, RIAs, analysts and small funds in public markets. |
Enterprise pricing in this table is quote-only and the figures shown are publicly reported third-party ranges gathered August 2026, not official quotes. Confirm current pricing with each vendor before budgeting. Investables.ai holds no private company data, no deal records, no cap tables and no fund performance data.
Side by side
Grata vs Investables.ai, honestly
A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.
| What matters | Investables.ai | Grata |
|---|---|---|
| Core job | Understand a public asset fast: thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics, comparables, risk flags | Find private companies matching a thesis and build a sourcing list from 21 million of them |
| Coverage | Public stocks, ETFs, crypto and other listed assets | About 21 million private companies, strongest in North America, expanded into the UK, France, Germany and Australia in July 2025 |
| Published pricing | $29, $79 and $249 a month, listed on the site | Three tiers named on the pricing page with no figures. Every deal is quoted |
| Time to first answer | Enter a ticker, read a structured card in seconds | Demo call, quote, contract, onboarding before the first search |
| Both sides of the argument | Every card carries a bull case and a bear case, plus risk flags | A sourcing and data platform. Forming the view is your job |
| Ownership | Independent | A Datasite business unit since 3 June 2025, alongside Sourcescrub and Valu8 |
| Contract | Monthly, cancel any time | Annual minimum with auto-renewal and documented cancellation admin fees |
| API | Not offered today | Available as a separately priced add-on rather than a tier feature |
| Who it fits | Individual investors, RIAs, analysts and small funds working in public markets | Private equity, corporate development, M&A advisors and search funds doing origination |
Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.
Why analysts pick Investables.ai
One structured research card for every name you study
Do not budget against the $155,000 median
One figure dominates the search results for Grata pricing: a median contract of $155,000 a year. Its own source states the sample plainly, six third-party buyer reports, and rates its confidence at 30%. It also sits above $100,000, which is the top of the range other sources describe as typical. A median that exceeds the ceiling of every other published estimate, drawn from six data points, is not a number to build a budget on. It is the best guess available in a market with almost no data, and it should be read that way. The more useful working figure is the reported $10,000 to $100,000 span, with small teams landing near the bottom of it.
Grata is part of Datasite now, and that changes the roadmap question
Datasite acquired Grata on 3 June 2025, with controlling shareholder CapVest committing $500 million to expand its intelligence business. Grata then acquired Sourcescrub in August 2025, and Datasite added the Swedish platform Valu8 in May 2026. The practical effect is that Grata and its closest direct competitor now sit under the same owner, which removes the most obvious competitive lever a buyer had. Ask directly how the products will be packaged and priced together, and get the answer before signing a multi-year term rather than after.
Sourcing tools and research tools are not substitutes
Grata answers which companies exist that match a profile. It does not tell you whether any of them is a good investment, and it is not built to. If your team is doing origination across private markets, that is exactly the right tool and nothing on this page argues otherwise. If the actual question is whether a listed company is worth owning, a private company search engine is a costly detour. That mismatch is common enough in the search traffic for these terms that it is worth naming rather than glossing over.
Good questions
Grata vs Investables.ai, answered
More comparisons
See how Investables.ai compares
Seeking Alpha alternative
A balanced first-pass research card with both sides, not a feed of opinions to sift.
vs KoyfinKoyfin alternative
Synthesized thesis and both sides, not just charts and raw data to interpret.
vs Simply Wall StSimply Wall St alternative
A balanced thesis with bull, bear and risk flags, beyond visual snowflake summaries.
vs AlphaSenseAlphaSense alternative
An instant structured research card, not an enterprise document-search project.
vs Bloomberg TerminalBloomberg Terminal alternative
A structured AI research card for a monthly fee, when a terminal seat is not in the budget.
vs S&P Capital IQCapital IQ alternative
The analysis without the five-figure seat.
vs FactSetFactSet alternative
The read on a company, without the workstation contract.
vs PitchBookPitchBook alternative
Honest about what replaces it, and what does not.
vs LSEG WorkspaceLSEG Workspace alternative
Including what happened to Refinitiv Eikon.
vs PreqinPreqin alternative
Including what a contract really costs since BlackRock bought it.
vs CB InsightsCB Insights alternative
Including why the verified median contract is lower than the floor everyone quotes.
vs Morningstar DirectMorningstar Direct alternative
Including what a seat really costs now that the price list is gone.
vs YChartsYCharts alternative
Advisor research platforms compared on price, proposals and data.
vs Visible AlphaVisible Alpha alternative
Consensus estimates tools compared on depth and price.
Comparing on cost across the whole category? Our investment research platform pricing page lists what every major platform charges, checked against vendor pages.
Make your own research faster with Investables.ai
Turn any ticker into a structured research card with the thesis, both sides of the argument and the risk flags in seconds. You stay in control of every decision.
Informational only, not financial advice · past performance does not guarantee future results