Investables.ai

Compare · Grata

Grata alternatives and competitors, with pricing and Grata vs PitchBook

Grata is a sourcing engine for private markets: find the companies that fit a thesis, build the list, work the outreach. Investables.ai is a public-market research layer: one structured card per public asset, both sides of the argument, risk flags surfaced, in seconds, on a monthly subscription. They do genuinely different jobs, and they share this page because a meaningful share of Grata pricing searches come from people whose real question turns out to be about public companies.

AI research card

Stocks · ETFs · Crypto · Startups
$
Try:
Reading filings, metrics & comparables…

Enter any ticker to see a research card

Thesis, bull and bear case, key metrics, comparables and risk flags, synthesized into one structured tear-sheet.

Sample output is illustrative. Not financial advice.

Illustrative only

Thesis

Bull case

Bear case

Key metrics

illustrative

illustrative price trend, not live data

Comparables

Risk flags

Informational only · sample output, not live market data · not financial advice.

Enter a ticker · read the research card · you decide

Grata is an AI-native private company search platform covering roughly 21 million private companies, built for deal sourcing rather than for reading a market. Founded in New York in 2016, it was acquired by Datasite on 3 June 2025 and now runs as a business unit inside it. Grata publishes tier names but no prices, and the single median figure circulating for it is weaker evidence than almost anyone quoting it realizes.

The short answer

What is the best Grata alternative?

It depends what you use Grata for. For private company financials, deal comps and fund data rather than sourcing, PitchBook at a median $31,875 a year. For technology market maps and startup health scoring, CB Insights at $46,984. For cheap broad sourcing, Tracxn at a reported $1,000 to $1,500 a month or Crunchbase at $99. For European coverage, Dealroom from about EUR 12,500. Sourcescrub was the closest direct competitor and is now owned by Datasite too, which narrows the field. For public company research, Investables.ai from $29 a month. Grata itself is quote-only and reported at roughly $10,000 to $100,000 a year.

Last updated August 2026

What each one costs

Grata pricing vs Investables.ai pricing

Grata publishes three tier names and no prices. Everything below is what buyers, comparison sources and procurement marketplaces reported publicly as of August 2026. Read the note on the median row before you budget against it.

Plan or deployment Price (USD) What you get
Commonly reported range $10,000 to $100,000 / year Varies by company size, use case and negotiation. The most honest figure available
Circulating "median" contract $155,000 / year Built on six buyer reports at 30% stated confidence, and above the top of the reported range. Weak evidence
Growth tier Quote only Named on the Grata pricing page with no figure attached. Entry search and list building
Scale tier Quote only Named with no figure. Larger teams, broader exports and workflow features
Alpha tier Quote only Named with no figure. The top configuration, where API and integrations sit
Add Ons Quote only, priced separately API access and extra modules are line items rather than tier features
Contract terms One year minimum, auto-renewal Cancellation administrative fees are documented. Read the renewal clause
Free tier or self-serve trial None Demo request only. No way to create an account from the website
Investables.ai Analyst $29 / month 50 research cards a month with thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics and risk flags
Investables.ai Pro $79 / month 300 cards a month plus earnings call and filing summaries, exports
Investables.ai Team $249 / month Shared workspace, higher limits and team seats

Grata figures are publicly reported third-party ranges gathered August 2026, not official quotes. The $155,000 median is shown because it is widely cited, not because it is reliable: its source states a sample of six buyer reports and a 30% confidence rating, and it sits above the top of the range other sources report. Confirm current pricing with Grata or Datasite before budgeting.

The full landscape

Grata competitors compared

What each platform is actually for, what it reportedly costs, and who it fits. Enterprise figures are third-party reported ranges gathered August 2026, not quotes.

Platform Reported price What it is for and who it fits
Grata Quote only. Reported $10,000 to $100,000 / year AI-native private company search across about 21 million companies, built for deal origination. PE, corporate development, M&A advisors and search funds. A Datasite business unit since June 2025.
Sourcescrub Quote only The closest like-for-like sourcing competitor, focused on bootstrapped and founder-owned companies. Acquired by Grata in August 2025, so now the same owner.
PitchBook Quote only. Median reported $31,875 / year Private company financials, deal comps, cap tables and fund performance. Deal teams that need diligence data rather than discovery. Much deeper verified pricing sample.
CB Insights Quote only. Median $46,984 / year Technology market maps, emerging startup discovery and Mosaic health scores. Corporate strategy and innovation teams rather than origination teams.
Tracxn Reported $1,000 to $1,500 / month Broad startup sourcing across hundreds of sectors with analyst review. The budget option for scouting.
Crunchbase Pro $99 / month, Business $199 / month Company and funding basics. Wide coverage, correspondingly shallow. Early sourcing and quick lookups.
Dealroom Premium from about EUR 12,500 / year European startup and investment intelligence with strong regional depth. Three-seat minimum.
Preqin Quote only. Median reported near $50,000 / year Alternative assets: fund performance, LP commitments and GP benchmarking. Owned by BlackRock since 2025.
Investables.ai $29 to $249 / month A structured AI research card per public asset: thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics, comparables and risk flags. No private company data. Individual investors, RIAs, analysts and small funds in public markets.

Enterprise pricing in this table is quote-only and the figures shown are publicly reported third-party ranges gathered August 2026, not official quotes. Confirm current pricing with each vendor before budgeting. Investables.ai holds no private company data, no deal records, no cap tables and no fund performance data.

Side by side

Grata vs Investables.ai, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters Investables.ai Grata
Core job Understand a public asset fast: thesis, bull case, bear case, metrics, comparables, risk flags Find private companies matching a thesis and build a sourcing list from 21 million of them
Coverage Public stocks, ETFs, crypto and other listed assets About 21 million private companies, strongest in North America, expanded into the UK, France, Germany and Australia in July 2025
Published pricing $29, $79 and $249 a month, listed on the site Three tiers named on the pricing page with no figures. Every deal is quoted
Time to first answer Enter a ticker, read a structured card in seconds Demo call, quote, contract, onboarding before the first search
Both sides of the argument Every card carries a bull case and a bear case, plus risk flags A sourcing and data platform. Forming the view is your job
Ownership Independent A Datasite business unit since 3 June 2025, alongside Sourcescrub and Valu8
Contract Monthly, cancel any time Annual minimum with auto-renewal and documented cancellation admin fees
API Not offered today Available as a separately priced add-on rather than a tier feature
Who it fits Individual investors, RIAs, analysts and small funds working in public markets Private equity, corporate development, M&A advisors and search funds doing origination

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest.

Why analysts pick Investables.ai

One structured research card for every name you study

Do not budget against the $155,000 median

One figure dominates the search results for Grata pricing: a median contract of $155,000 a year. Its own source states the sample plainly, six third-party buyer reports, and rates its confidence at 30%. It also sits above $100,000, which is the top of the range other sources describe as typical. A median that exceeds the ceiling of every other published estimate, drawn from six data points, is not a number to build a budget on. It is the best guess available in a market with almost no data, and it should be read that way. The more useful working figure is the reported $10,000 to $100,000 span, with small teams landing near the bottom of it.

Grata is part of Datasite now, and that changes the roadmap question

Datasite acquired Grata on 3 June 2025, with controlling shareholder CapVest committing $500 million to expand its intelligence business. Grata then acquired Sourcescrub in August 2025, and Datasite added the Swedish platform Valu8 in May 2026. The practical effect is that Grata and its closest direct competitor now sit under the same owner, which removes the most obvious competitive lever a buyer had. Ask directly how the products will be packaged and priced together, and get the answer before signing a multi-year term rather than after.

Sourcing tools and research tools are not substitutes

Grata answers which companies exist that match a profile. It does not tell you whether any of them is a good investment, and it is not built to. If your team is doing origination across private markets, that is exactly the right tool and nothing on this page argues otherwise. If the actual question is whether a listed company is worth owning, a private company search engine is a costly detour. That mismatch is common enough in the search traffic for these terms that it is worth naming rather than glossing over.

Good questions

Grata vs Investables.ai, answered

Grata is quote-only and publishes no prices at any tier. Reported contracts run roughly $10,000 to $100,000 a year depending on company size, use case and negotiation. A median of $155,000 a year circulates widely, but its source cites only six buyer reports and a 30% confidence rating, and it exceeds the top of every other reported range. Contracts carry a one year minimum and auto-renew. Figures gathered August 2026.
No. There is no free tier, no self-serve signup and no published trial. Access starts with a demo request handled by sales, and any evaluation period is negotiated as part of that conversation. If you want to test coverage before committing, ask for a scoped trial run against your own target list rather than a guided demo on their examples.
Datasite. The acquisition closed on 3 June 2025, and CapVest Partners, which controls Datasite, committed $500 million to expand its intelligence solutions. Grata was founded in New York in 2016 and continues to operate under its own brand as a Datasite business unit. It acquired Sourcescrub in August 2025, and Datasite added Valu8 in May 2026.
Grata publishes three tier names on its pricing page, Growth, Scale and Alpha, plus a separate Add Ons section, and attaches no dollar figure to any of them. Every tier routes to a demo request. The tier names are still useful in a negotiation because they tell you the vendor thinks in three bands, so ask which band your quote sits in and what moves you down one.
It is priced separately and not published. API access sits in the Add Ons section rather than inside a tier, which in practice means it is quoted on top of the platform license. Across this vendor category, programmatic access consistently pushes contracts toward the high end of the reported range, so budget for it as a distinct line item rather than assuming it comes with the top tier.
They solve different halves of the problem. Grata is stronger at finding private companies that match a thesis, especially ones with little funding history, because its search works from company websites rather than from deal records. PitchBook is stronger once you have a target: financials, deal comps, cap tables, investor records and fund performance, at a verified median of $31,875 a year across a much deeper sample. Sourcing teams often run one of each.
Sourcescrub was, and Grata acquired it in August 2025, so both now sit under Datasite. Among independent options, Cyndx and Tracxn compete on private company discovery, Crunchbase covers funding basics at $99 a month, and Dealroom is the strongest European alternative from about EUR 12,500 a year. The consolidation matters: the most obvious like-for-like comparison in a Grata negotiation is now owned by the same company.
If your team runs private market origination at volume, probably yes, because manual sourcing across 21 million companies is not a job people do well. The test is how many qualified targets you need to surface a year and what your current process costs to reach them. If the answer is a handful, the contract is hard to justify against a $10,000 floor. If it is hundreds, the platform pays for itself on analyst time alone.
Only incidentally. Grata is built for private company discovery, and public market fundamentals, valuation work and earnings analysis are not what it is for. Paying five figures a year to answer a public markets question is an expensive way to get a worse answer. That specific mismatch is why Investables.ai appears at the bottom of these tables rather than the top.

More comparisons

See how Investables.ai compares

vs Seeking Alpha

Seeking Alpha alternative

A balanced first-pass research card with both sides, not a feed of opinions to sift.

vs Koyfin

Koyfin alternative

Synthesized thesis and both sides, not just charts and raw data to interpret.

vs Simply Wall St

Simply Wall St alternative

A balanced thesis with bull, bear and risk flags, beyond visual snowflake summaries.

vs AlphaSense

AlphaSense alternative

An instant structured research card, not an enterprise document-search project.

vs Bloomberg Terminal

Bloomberg Terminal alternative

A structured AI research card for a monthly fee, when a terminal seat is not in the budget.

vs S&P Capital IQ

Capital IQ alternative

The analysis without the five-figure seat.

vs FactSet

FactSet alternative

The read on a company, without the workstation contract.

vs PitchBook

PitchBook alternative

Honest about what replaces it, and what does not.

vs LSEG Workspace

LSEG Workspace alternative

Including what happened to Refinitiv Eikon.

vs Preqin

Preqin alternative

Including what a contract really costs since BlackRock bought it.

vs CB Insights

CB Insights alternative

Including why the verified median contract is lower than the floor everyone quotes.

vs Morningstar Direct

Morningstar Direct alternative

Including what a seat really costs now that the price list is gone.

vs YCharts

YCharts alternative

Advisor research platforms compared on price, proposals and data.

vs Visible Alpha

Visible Alpha alternative

Consensus estimates tools compared on depth and price.

Comparing on cost across the whole category? Our investment research platform pricing page lists what every major platform charges, checked against vendor pages.

Make your own research faster with Investables.ai

Turn any ticker into a structured research card with the thesis, both sides of the argument and the risk flags in seconds. You stay in control of every decision.

See pricing

Informational only, not financial advice · past performance does not guarantee future results